To Corvideye

Date: 2012-09-21 12:03 am (UTC)
Then at least in your case I have failed to communicate my understanding of de Charnay's words. Of course, he is concerned that the young men he advises should demonstrate their prowess for all to see, but he also points out that many deeds that should garner the doer great glory remain unseen, or unnoticed, and insists that these deeds are also worthy. If you do some worthy deed, then you are better for it even if no one (except you) sees that.
And yes, Sir Geoffrey is more concerned with quality than quantity; or rather with a continuing increase in the worth of your actions. So a man who fights in the lists is worthy, but a man who rides in the joust has done a greater and more more difficult thing, and thus has done more. From here he works his way through going to war nearby, going a long way to a war, learning to run an army, or besiege a town, etc. Eventually he says that a Prince (by which he means anyone from Viscount up, it seems) who does not *have to* do these things but does anyway is the most worthy. His advice to young men-at-arms is to sign on with such a Prince's army and try to work your way up the ladder with worthy deeds. It is very 14th Century, and I abstracted the central theme only, seemingly omitting too much context.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

zzambrosius_02: (Default)
zzambrosius_02

February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 08:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios